Practici de mediatizare a războiului ruso-ucrainean în talk-show-urile politice. O analiză de dispozitiv televizual
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##
Published
Jun 24, 2025
Download
Statistic
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##
Abstract
The article approaches the mediatization of the Russian-Ukrainian war from the perspective of the predominant information and debate practices in two established political talk shows in the Romanian television sphere. Situated within a constructivist analytical framework, the research discusses the influence of television on audiences in the new media culture and, specifically, the production of regimes of event visibility and audience engagement. Methodologically, the research uses the dispozitive analysis to highlight the strategic organization of television mediatization in relation to the communication project of the media actor. The study demonstrates that both talk shows, conceptualized as dispozitives, have an analytical purpose (of explaining the event) and a warning/alert one. These purposes are, however, achieved differently, depending on the socio-institutional, symbolic and technological particularities of the talk show. The research results are interpreted from the perspective of the performativity of media (televisual) discourse (Broersma, 2019; Dayan, 2015; Chouliaraki, 2006), its potential to establish an emotionally and ethically significant reality for the audience.
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Beciu, C., & Lazăr, M. (2025). Practici de mediatizare a războiului ruso-ucrainean în talk-show-urile politice. O analiză de dispozitiv televizual. Sociologie Românească, 23(1), 22-54. https://doi.org/10.33788/sr.23.1.2
References
Basu, L. (2011). Memory dispositifs and national identities: The case of Ned Kelly, Memory Studies, 4(1), 33-41.
Beciu, C. (2006). Les émissions de débat en Roumanie. Entre paternalisme ludique et confession gratifiante, în G. Lochard (ed.), Les débats publics dans les télévisions européennes, Paris: L’Harmattan, 171-185.
Beciu, C. (2011). Sociologia comunicării și a spațiului public, Iași: Polirom.
Beciu, C. (2020). Jurnalismul politic în sfera televizuală din România. Actori, practici, contexte în M. Petcu (coord.), Mass Media din România după 30 de ani, București: Tritonic, 87-106.
Beciu, C., & Lazăr, M. (2024). Rol jurnalistic și postură performativă. O analiză semio-discursivă a mediatizării războiului din Ucraina la televiziunile de știri din România, în F. Ardelean, & I. Laza (coord.), Mass media, sub lupa cercetătorilor și a practicienilor, București: Tritonic, 49-87.
Beciu, C., Lazăr, M., & Mădroane, I. D. (2018). Mediating Public Issues in Romanian Broadcast Talk: Personalized Communication Strategies, Television and New Media, 19(1), 75-92.
Boltanski, L. (2004). Distant suffering: Morality, media and politics (G. Burchell, Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bossio, D. (2021). Journalists on Instagram: presenting professional identity and role on image-focused social media, Journalism practice, 17(1), 1-17.
Broersma, M. (2010). Journalism as performative discourse. The importance of form and style in journalism, în V. Rupar (ed.), Journalism and Meaning-Making: Reading the Newspaper, Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press, 15-35.
Broersma, M. (2019). The Legitimacy Paradox, Journalism, 20(1), 92-94.
Broersma, M., & Graham, T. (2013). Twitter as a news source: How Dutch and British newspapers used tweets in their news coverage, 2007-2011, Journalism practice, 7(4), 446-464.
Bussolini, J. (2010). What is a Dispositive? Foucault Studies, 10, 85-107.
Caborn, J. (2007). On the Methodology of Dispositive Analysis, Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis across Disciplines, 1(1), 115-123.
Charaudeau, P. (1992). Grammaire de sens et de l’expression, Paris: Hachette.
Charaudeau, P. (1997). Le discours d’information médiatique. La construction du miroir social, Paris : Nathan-INA.
Charaudeau, P. [2005] (2011). Les médias et l’information: L’impossible transparence du Discours. 2ème éd. Bruxelles: De Boeck-Ina.
Charaudeau, P. (2006). Discours journalistique et positionnements énonciatifs. Frontières et derives, Revue SEMEN, 22. Disponibil la https://doi.org/10.4000/semen.2793.
Charaudeau, P. (2016). Le discours doit être analysé en rapport avec les dispositifs de mise en scène, în H. Boyer, & G. Lochard, Entretien avec Patrick Charaudeau, Mots. Les langages du politique, 111, 131-146.
Couldry, N. (2000). The Place of Media Power. Pilgrims and witnesses of the media age, London: Routledge.
Chouliaraki, L. (2006). The Spectatorship of Suffering, London: Sage Publications.
Crano, R. (2020). Dispositif, Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Literature. Disponibil la https://oxfordre.com/literature/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190201098.001.0001/acrefore-9780190201098-e-1026.
Davallon, J. (2024). Les dispositifs informatisés de médiatisation muséale et patrimoniale: préfigurations d’un questionnement, Les Enjeux de l’Information et de la Communication, 24(2), 17-41.
Dayan, D. (sous la dir de) (2006). La terreur spectacle. Terrorisme et television, Bruxelles: De Boeck.
Dayan, D. (2015). Un événement qui apparaît. Le 11 septembre 2001 vu par Daniel Dayan. Propos recueillis par François Quinton et Isabelle Didier et Philippe Raynaud, La revue des médias. Disponibil la https://larevuedesmedias.ina.fr/attentats-11-septembre-2001-terrorisme-medias-daniel-dayan.
Dolon, R., & Todoli, J. (eds.) (2008). Analysing Identities in Discourse, Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm, Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51-58.
Foucault, M. (1972). The Archeology of Knowledge and the Discourse on Language, New York: Pantheon Books.
Foucault, M. (1980). The Confession of the Flesh. în C. Gordon (ed.), POWER/KNOWLEDGE Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972-1977, New York: Pantheon Books, 194-229.
Hepp, A. (2014). Communicative Figurations: Researching Cultures of Mediatization, în L. Kramp et al. (eds.), Media Practice and Everyday Agency in Europe, Bremen: Edition Lumiere, 83-101.
Hermida, A., Domingo, D., Heinonen, A., Paulussen, S., Quandt, T., Reich, Z., Singer, J. B., & Vujnovic, M. (2011). The Active Recipient: Participatory Journalism through the Lens of the Dewey-Lippmann Debate. The International Symposium on Online Journalism. University of Texas, Austin, April 2011.
Hermida, A., & Mellado, C. (2020). Dimensions of Social Media Logics: Mapping Forms of Journalistic Norms and Practices on Twitter and Instagram, Digital Journalism, 8(7), 864-884.
Jäger, S., & Maier, F. (2016). Analysing discourses and dispositives: A Foucauldian approach to theory and methodology. în R. Wodak și M. Meyer (eds.), Methods of Critical Discourse Studies, London: Sage Publications, 109-136.
Jovanovic, D., & Van Leeuwen, T. (2018). Multimodal dialogue on social media, Social Semiotics, 28(5), 683-699.
Kessler, F., Chateau, D., & Moure, J. (2016). The Screen and the Concept of Dispositif - A Dialogue, în D. Chateau și J. Moure (eds.), Screens, Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 264-271.
Kress, G. (2011). Multimodal discourse analysis, în J. P. Gee, & M. Handford (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Discourse Analysis, London: Routledge.
Larroche, V. (2019). The dispositif. A Concept for Information and Communication sciences, London: Wiley.
Livingstone, S., & Lunt, P. (1994). Talk on Television. Audience Participation and Public Debate, London: Routledge.
Lochard, G. (dir.) (2006). Les débats publics dans les télévisions européennes, Paris: L’Harmattan.
Lochard, G., & Soulages, J.-C. (2003). La parole politique a la télévision. Du logos à l’ethos, Réseaux, 118(2), 65-94.
Mădroane, I. D., & Cârlan, A. I. (2023). The enactment of rhetorical citizenship in a cultural journalism podcast: empowering low-skilled women migrants, Feminist media studies, 24(6), 1405-1421.
McCombes, M., Lopez-Escobar, M. E., & Llamas, J.P. (2000). Setting the agenda of attributes in the 1996 Spanish general election, Journal of communication, 50(2), 77-92.
McCombes, M., & Shaw, D. L. (1972). [reprinted 2017)] The agenda-setting function of mass media. The Agenda Setting Journal, 1(2), 105-116.
Mellado, C. (2022). Roles and digital identities on Twitter and Instagram: An ethnographic study of Chilean journalists, El Profesional de la Información, 31(4), 1-16.
Mellado, C., & Hermida, A. (2024). The Journalist on Social Media: Mapping the Promoter, Celebrity and Joker Roles on Twitter and Instagram, Digital Journalism, 12(4), 494-515.
Morelli, P., & Lazar, M. (2015). Plasticité des dispositifs d’information et de communication, Questions de communication, 28, 7-17.
Nel, N. (1999). Des dispositifs aux agencements télévisuels (1969-1983), Hermès, 25(3), 131-141.
Orgad, S. (2012). Media Representation and the Global Imagination. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
Peeters, H., & Charlier, P. (1999). Contributions à une théorie du dispositif, Hermès, 25, 15-23.
Peraya, D., & Bonfils, P. (2012). Nouveaux dispositifs médiatiques : comportements et usages émergents, Distances et médiations des savoirs, 1. Disponibil la http://journals.openedition.org/dms/126.
Perloff, R. M. (2014). The Dynamics of political communication. Media and Politics in a Digital Age, New York: Routledge.
Perpelea, N. (2018). Media Hospitality to Diasporactivism and Diasporapathy in the News Community, în C. Beciu, M. Ciocea, I. D. Mădroane, & A. I. Cârlan (eds.), Debating Migration as a Public Problem. National Publics and Transnational Fields, New York: Peter Lang, 41-63.
Singer, J. et al. (2011). Participatory journalism: Guarding open gates at online newspapers, Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
Van Leeuwen, T. (2008). Discourse and practice. New tools for critical discourse analysis, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Beciu, C. (2006). Les émissions de débat en Roumanie. Entre paternalisme ludique et confession gratifiante, în G. Lochard (ed.), Les débats publics dans les télévisions européennes, Paris: L’Harmattan, 171-185.
Beciu, C. (2011). Sociologia comunicării și a spațiului public, Iași: Polirom.
Beciu, C. (2020). Jurnalismul politic în sfera televizuală din România. Actori, practici, contexte în M. Petcu (coord.), Mass Media din România după 30 de ani, București: Tritonic, 87-106.
Beciu, C., & Lazăr, M. (2024). Rol jurnalistic și postură performativă. O analiză semio-discursivă a mediatizării războiului din Ucraina la televiziunile de știri din România, în F. Ardelean, & I. Laza (coord.), Mass media, sub lupa cercetătorilor și a practicienilor, București: Tritonic, 49-87.
Beciu, C., Lazăr, M., & Mădroane, I. D. (2018). Mediating Public Issues in Romanian Broadcast Talk: Personalized Communication Strategies, Television and New Media, 19(1), 75-92.
Boltanski, L. (2004). Distant suffering: Morality, media and politics (G. Burchell, Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bossio, D. (2021). Journalists on Instagram: presenting professional identity and role on image-focused social media, Journalism practice, 17(1), 1-17.
Broersma, M. (2010). Journalism as performative discourse. The importance of form and style in journalism, în V. Rupar (ed.), Journalism and Meaning-Making: Reading the Newspaper, Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press, 15-35.
Broersma, M. (2019). The Legitimacy Paradox, Journalism, 20(1), 92-94.
Broersma, M., & Graham, T. (2013). Twitter as a news source: How Dutch and British newspapers used tweets in their news coverage, 2007-2011, Journalism practice, 7(4), 446-464.
Bussolini, J. (2010). What is a Dispositive? Foucault Studies, 10, 85-107.
Caborn, J. (2007). On the Methodology of Dispositive Analysis, Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis across Disciplines, 1(1), 115-123.
Charaudeau, P. (1992). Grammaire de sens et de l’expression, Paris: Hachette.
Charaudeau, P. (1997). Le discours d’information médiatique. La construction du miroir social, Paris : Nathan-INA.
Charaudeau, P. [2005] (2011). Les médias et l’information: L’impossible transparence du Discours. 2ème éd. Bruxelles: De Boeck-Ina.
Charaudeau, P. (2006). Discours journalistique et positionnements énonciatifs. Frontières et derives, Revue SEMEN, 22. Disponibil la https://doi.org/10.4000/semen.2793.
Charaudeau, P. (2016). Le discours doit être analysé en rapport avec les dispositifs de mise en scène, în H. Boyer, & G. Lochard, Entretien avec Patrick Charaudeau, Mots. Les langages du politique, 111, 131-146.
Couldry, N. (2000). The Place of Media Power. Pilgrims and witnesses of the media age, London: Routledge.
Chouliaraki, L. (2006). The Spectatorship of Suffering, London: Sage Publications.
Crano, R. (2020). Dispositif, Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Literature. Disponibil la https://oxfordre.com/literature/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190201098.001.0001/acrefore-9780190201098-e-1026.
Davallon, J. (2024). Les dispositifs informatisés de médiatisation muséale et patrimoniale: préfigurations d’un questionnement, Les Enjeux de l’Information et de la Communication, 24(2), 17-41.
Dayan, D. (sous la dir de) (2006). La terreur spectacle. Terrorisme et television, Bruxelles: De Boeck.
Dayan, D. (2015). Un événement qui apparaît. Le 11 septembre 2001 vu par Daniel Dayan. Propos recueillis par François Quinton et Isabelle Didier et Philippe Raynaud, La revue des médias. Disponibil la https://larevuedesmedias.ina.fr/attentats-11-septembre-2001-terrorisme-medias-daniel-dayan.
Dolon, R., & Todoli, J. (eds.) (2008). Analysing Identities in Discourse, Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm, Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51-58.
Foucault, M. (1972). The Archeology of Knowledge and the Discourse on Language, New York: Pantheon Books.
Foucault, M. (1980). The Confession of the Flesh. în C. Gordon (ed.), POWER/KNOWLEDGE Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972-1977, New York: Pantheon Books, 194-229.
Hepp, A. (2014). Communicative Figurations: Researching Cultures of Mediatization, în L. Kramp et al. (eds.), Media Practice and Everyday Agency in Europe, Bremen: Edition Lumiere, 83-101.
Hermida, A., Domingo, D., Heinonen, A., Paulussen, S., Quandt, T., Reich, Z., Singer, J. B., & Vujnovic, M. (2011). The Active Recipient: Participatory Journalism through the Lens of the Dewey-Lippmann Debate. The International Symposium on Online Journalism. University of Texas, Austin, April 2011.
Hermida, A., & Mellado, C. (2020). Dimensions of Social Media Logics: Mapping Forms of Journalistic Norms and Practices on Twitter and Instagram, Digital Journalism, 8(7), 864-884.
Jäger, S., & Maier, F. (2016). Analysing discourses and dispositives: A Foucauldian approach to theory and methodology. în R. Wodak și M. Meyer (eds.), Methods of Critical Discourse Studies, London: Sage Publications, 109-136.
Jovanovic, D., & Van Leeuwen, T. (2018). Multimodal dialogue on social media, Social Semiotics, 28(5), 683-699.
Kessler, F., Chateau, D., & Moure, J. (2016). The Screen and the Concept of Dispositif - A Dialogue, în D. Chateau și J. Moure (eds.), Screens, Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 264-271.
Kress, G. (2011). Multimodal discourse analysis, în J. P. Gee, & M. Handford (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Discourse Analysis, London: Routledge.
Larroche, V. (2019). The dispositif. A Concept for Information and Communication sciences, London: Wiley.
Livingstone, S., & Lunt, P. (1994). Talk on Television. Audience Participation and Public Debate, London: Routledge.
Lochard, G. (dir.) (2006). Les débats publics dans les télévisions européennes, Paris: L’Harmattan.
Lochard, G., & Soulages, J.-C. (2003). La parole politique a la télévision. Du logos à l’ethos, Réseaux, 118(2), 65-94.
Mădroane, I. D., & Cârlan, A. I. (2023). The enactment of rhetorical citizenship in a cultural journalism podcast: empowering low-skilled women migrants, Feminist media studies, 24(6), 1405-1421.
McCombes, M., Lopez-Escobar, M. E., & Llamas, J.P. (2000). Setting the agenda of attributes in the 1996 Spanish general election, Journal of communication, 50(2), 77-92.
McCombes, M., & Shaw, D. L. (1972). [reprinted 2017)] The agenda-setting function of mass media. The Agenda Setting Journal, 1(2), 105-116.
Mellado, C. (2022). Roles and digital identities on Twitter and Instagram: An ethnographic study of Chilean journalists, El Profesional de la Información, 31(4), 1-16.
Mellado, C., & Hermida, A. (2024). The Journalist on Social Media: Mapping the Promoter, Celebrity and Joker Roles on Twitter and Instagram, Digital Journalism, 12(4), 494-515.
Morelli, P., & Lazar, M. (2015). Plasticité des dispositifs d’information et de communication, Questions de communication, 28, 7-17.
Nel, N. (1999). Des dispositifs aux agencements télévisuels (1969-1983), Hermès, 25(3), 131-141.
Orgad, S. (2012). Media Representation and the Global Imagination. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
Peeters, H., & Charlier, P. (1999). Contributions à une théorie du dispositif, Hermès, 25, 15-23.
Peraya, D., & Bonfils, P. (2012). Nouveaux dispositifs médiatiques : comportements et usages émergents, Distances et médiations des savoirs, 1. Disponibil la http://journals.openedition.org/dms/126.
Perloff, R. M. (2014). The Dynamics of political communication. Media and Politics in a Digital Age, New York: Routledge.
Perpelea, N. (2018). Media Hospitality to Diasporactivism and Diasporapathy in the News Community, în C. Beciu, M. Ciocea, I. D. Mădroane, & A. I. Cârlan (eds.), Debating Migration as a Public Problem. National Publics and Transnational Fields, New York: Peter Lang, 41-63.
Singer, J. et al. (2011). Participatory journalism: Guarding open gates at online newspapers, Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
Van Leeuwen, T. (2008). Discourse and practice. New tools for critical discourse analysis, Oxford: Oxford University Press.